Mardena Creek
CWC Bibliography No. 1, 1991
This bibliography summarizes six articles that offer practical advice about how to help diverse students learn--and write--in the university. To emphasize common themes that run through the literature, I have intentionally repeated advice offered by several sources. For those of us who have long used many of these approaches, the bibliography should serve as confirmation that our practices are sound. For those of us searching for new approaches, it should offer some useful--if basic--suggestions for effecting positive change. These articles represent only a small portion of our diversity collection. I encourage those interested in pursuing the issue in more depth, to consult our complete bibliography available in the University Writing Program, 378 Voorhies. We will be glad to photocopy any articles that interest you.
Dean, Terry. "Multicultural Classrooms, Monocultural Teachers." College Composition and Communication 40 (Feb. 1989): 23-37.
Dean, who teaches English at U.C. Davis, addresses the effects of "cultural dissonance" on students' abilities to master the conventions of academic discourse. To help students overcome the alienation created by this dissonance, Dean urges writing teachers to develop theories and practices that will "both help students write their way into the university and help teachers learn their way into student cultures" (23). He encourages teachers to build bridges between the home cultures that have shaped students' identities and the academic culture whose language and assumptions students must understand. Although teachers need to devise their own means for helping such students mediate between cultures, Dean suggests the following strategies as places to begin:
Farr, Marcia and Harvey Daniels. "Writing Instruction and
Nonmainstream Students." Language Diversity and Language
Instruction. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of
English, 1986: 43-85.
After reviewing current research, Farr and Daniels conclude that the most important component of effective writing instruction is the teacher's positive attitude. Teachers who demonstrate respect for the diverse language backgrounds of students and exhibit confidence in their ability to master new language skills are more likely to succeed in the language classroom than are those who focus on error and have lowered expectations. Farr and Daniels also discuss other components of effective writing instruction and make the following suggestions for teachers who wish to improve writing instruction:
Goodman, Marcia. "Innocent Impostors: Gender, Genre, and the Teaching of Writing." Visions and Revisions: Research for Writing Teachers 2 (Spring 1990): 37-51. University of California, Davis: Center for Cooperative Educational Research.
Like basic and multicultural writers, women often feel alienated from
the forms and stances required by academic discourse. Drawing on her
own observations as a writing teacher and on the works of
psychologists who have investigated gender differences, Goodman
posits that the forms of academic discourse may work to silence
women. Pointing to the emphasis these forms place on objectivity,
analysis, and linearity, Goodman argues that they privilege male
values and male ways of thinking. While many women students
admittedly handle these forms masterfully, Goodman notes that such
forms allow women little opportunity to articulate their own visions
and values.
While Goodman is careful to avoid making "hard and fast distinctions" (45) between how males and females learn and write, she does draw some generalizations about important differences she has observed in their approaches to writing. Women students, she notes, tend to feel more comfortable with exploratory and personal forms of writing than with argumentation, to become more involved in the writing process than do men students, and to choose topics that allow them "to connect their personal feelings, beliefs, and experiences with the course materials" (46). After observing these differences, Goodman urges writing teachers to consider ways to make writing and writing assignments less gender biased and offers the following suggestions:
O'Hearn, Carolyn. "Recognizing the Learning Disabled College Writer." College English 51 (March 1989): 294-304.
In an attempt to help composition teachers identify learning disabled students, O'Hearn enumerates the distinctive features of these students' in-class writing. According to O'Hearn, this writing is characterized by frequent spelling errors of the following three types: confusion of homonyms and near-homonyms, transposed letters, omitted letters and syllables. Thus learning disabled students might write "witch" for "which," or "as" for "has," "dose" for "does," or "arond" for "around." They might also have trouble with the conventions governing punctuation and capitalization.
O'Hearn emphasizes that it is the pattern and frequency of such errors that separate the writing of a learning disabled student from that of a careless writer or a writer who does not speak standard English. Understanding the difference between a learning disabled student and a careless or indifferent one, O'Hearn points out, is essential if we wish to evaluate learning disabled students fairly and humanely. In addition, identifying students who may have learning disabilities is the first step in helping them obtain the extra assistance they may need to succeed in the university. While O'Hearn empahsizes that teachers are not equipped to diagnose learning disabled students, she argues that they are equipped to recognize the types of writing errors that often signify the problem.
Sedlacek, William E. "Teaching Minority Students." Teaching
Minority Students. Ed. J. H. Cones, J.F. Noonan, and D. Janha.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Josey-Bass,
1983: 39-50.
Addressing the low retention rate of minority students in predominantly white institutions, Sedlacek's article isolates seven "noncognitive variables" that help determine the academic success of minority students. According to his research, supportive adults, a positive self-concept, the ability to set realistic goals, and the opportunity to demonstrate non-traditional knowledge are among the more important predictors of minority students' academic success. Based on these findings, Sedlacek offers the following suggestions for teachers interested in improving the education of minority students:
Winningham, Beth. "How Language Minority Students Learn in the Content Areas." The Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing 12 (Winter 1990): 4-6.
Winningham examines how ESL (English as Second Language) students learn in the content areas and concludes that the teacher-dominant, lecture-style classroom fails to meet their particular needs. She suggests that content area teachers who wish to enhance the learning of their ESL students should adapt the following techniques.
Mardena Creek
CWC Bibliography No. 1, 1991
Return to Writing in the Disciplines.